Google Now Charging $5 to List Chrome Extensions

Curtis Chen
Aug. 24 2010, 06:14PM EDT

On August 19th, Google introduced “two significant changes in the Google Chrome Extensions Gallery: a developer signup fee and a domain verification system.”  As announced on The Chromium Blog, Google implemented these changes for security reasons, to “create better safeguards against fraudulent extensions in the gallery and limit the activity of malicious developer accounts.”

Arguably, the more significant of the two changes is the $5 developer signup fee.  (Note:  Any developers who signed up before 11:00 AM PST on August 19th are exempt.)  Five dollars isn’t exorbitant, especially when compared to the $25 registration fee for developers on Google’s Android Market or the $99 annual fee for Apple’s iPhone Developer Program, but the principle may rankle more than the financial burden for many open-source true believers.

Verified Chrome Extension

Of course, the Chrome browser will still allow you to install extensions downloaded from anywhere on the web, but users are more likely to find--and trust--extensions that come from Google’s “official” library.  As noted by TechCrunch, it’s unlikely that this is a revenue-based decision:

Google says they now have over 6,000 extensions in their gallery. And they’re downloaded some 10 million times a month by Chrome users.  By the 6,000 metric, Google would have made a whopping $30,000 if they had they extension fee in place from the beginning — so clearly this isn’t about the money.

It’s unclear whether a small fee like this and simple domain verification will do much to stop fraudulent or malicious extensions from appearing in the Chrome Extensions Gallery, but since Chrome extensions can affect a user’s entire web browsing experience, any safeguards should be a net positive.  In the end, requiring these two checks will at least provide tangible infractions which could speed up the process of suspending or terminating malicious user accounts.

Curtis Chen Once a software engineer in Silicon Valley; now a science fiction writer and puzzle hunt maker near Portland, Oregon. You may have seen his "Cat Feeding Robot" Ignite presentation. Curtis is not an aardvark.

Comments

Comments(2)

User HTML

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

This is ridiculous. I just created a useful extension and they asked me for $5 to publish it. I'm improving their browser!

Loren

I don't quite get it. How is $5 supposed to materially affect evil extensions? If profit is a motive, any exploit will be well-worth $5 to distribute. I agree it's also not a huge revenue-maker so I'm a bit mystified as to its purpose. The only thing it might stop is a Developer spamming dozens of different forms of an extension. (And even then standard machine ID / network attributes should help identify and shutdown.) I must be missing some sort of negative behavior.